![]() |
Dr David Wellington Greerton Chiropractic greertonchiropractic |
The topic of stroke (as a result of vertebral artery dissection) and chiropractic manipulation is always delicate if not inflammatory. There are two opposing opinions. First is, the risk is almost negligible ie one in 5,000,000 cervical manipulations to one per 20,000. Or, with two recent epidemiological studies results indicating no casual association versus a casual association.
Two recent epidemiological studies.
1) Chiropractic manipulation and stroke a population-based case-control study
Deanna M. Rothwell et al 2001
Results – Results for those aged <45 years showed VBA cases to be 5 times more likely than controls to have visited a chiropractor within 1 week of the VBA (95% CI from bootstrapping, 1.32 to 43.87). Additionally, in the younger age group, cases were 5 times as likely to have had 3 visits with a cervical diagnosis in the month before the case's VBA date (95% CI from bootstrapping, 1.34 to 18.57). No significant associations were found for those aged 45 years.
Conclusions – While our analysis is consistent with a positive association in young adults, potential sources of bias are also discussed. The rarity of VBAs makes this association difficult to study despite high volumes of chiropractic treatment. Because of the popularity of spinal manipulation, high-quality research on both its risks and benefits is recommended
2) Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case-control and case-crossover Study

